|
Disturbances at university (Jordan) |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
|
Bismillah al-Rahman al-Raheem
All things of a Muslim are inviolable for another Muslim: his blood, his wealth and his honour.
Four people were killed and tens of others were injured in the riots following a brawl between two students at al-Hussein University in Ma’an. The incident was the worst in a series of disturbances that have recently blighted Jordanian universities and spilled off the campuses and into the streets, with the brawlers using stones, batons and even automatic weapons. The escalating wave of violence was remarkable; it is an extension of another violence being practised on a wider scale amongst members of society and it is triggered by disputes that soon turn into violent tribal-tinged confrontations, and extend to several villages and towns. This new situation stems without a shade of a doubt from the state’s policy of infesting society with the causes of these disputes and brawls.
Although the violence at universities emanates from the causes of violence in society, it is, however, the state’s policy vis-à- vis elementary and high education that has had a major impact on sowing the seeds of division. The curricula for the elementary education are by and large geared towards the so-called patriotic education, which confines the sense of loyalty and belonging to this regime and the concepts and values it relies upon for its existence. These are namely the concepts and values of the Kafir West which conspicuously contradict the concepts and values of Islam, the religion of this Ummah, notwithstanding the educational policies imposed upon this regime by the Kafir West to corrupt the education system and groom a generation of students devoid of any viewpoint towards life, save for the Kafir Western viewpoint with which the minds of our pupils are filled. A brief review of the education curricula and the styles of teaching would clearly reveal the scale of the tragedy that the Jordanian primary and high school education is experiencing. Now this policy’s chickens have come home to roost; specifically, a generation saturated with Western culture and devoid of Islamic culture, in addition to poor reading and writing skills, the policy of automatic promotion and the sabotaging of the educational and schooling process, by undermining the teacher’s personality in the eyes of the students.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
The Kurdish Issue between the Greater Kurdistan Project and the Regional Role of Turkey |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
|
Bismillah al-Rahman al-Raheem
Political Analysis
The Kurdish Issue between the Greater Kurdistan Project and the Regional Role of Turkey
On Thursday 21 March 2013, the leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), Abdullah Ocalan, ordered his party’s fighters to cease fire and withdraw from Turkey to northern Iraq. This call came through the message read out by the deputy for the Peace and Democracy Party, Sırrl Süreyya Önder, during the Kurdish New Year celebrations in Diyarbakir. To quote from Ocalan’s message: “Let the guns be silenced and let politics dominate.” He added: "We have reached the stage where our armed elements need to retreat beyond the border. This is not an end. This is a new start." He described the stage by saying: “A new era starts when politics, instead of guns, comes to the forefront.” He stressed that “this is not a time of disagreements, clashes, insulting one another but alliance, solidarity, embracing each other and reconciliation.” The way had been paved for this historic announcement when on 13 March 2013, the PKK released eight Turkish nationals that it had been holding for two years in the Qandil mountains that stretch across northern Iraq and southeastern Turkey. A day later, the Turkish court of the city of Erzurum released 13 people who had been accused of PKK membership, and on 15 March 2013, the Istanbul court released another 7 also accused of PKK membership.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
The Fallouts of Olmert’s Resignation |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
|
Bismillah al-Rahman al-Raheem
Political Analysis
The Fallouts of Olmert’s Resignation:
The Deputy National Security Advisor Elliott Abrams who oversees Middle East affairs for the White House said during a meeting with Jewish communal leaders in New York on 23 July 2008 that “even if any agreement is reached in these talks, it will be between only Livni and Qurei, not between the Israeli and Palestinian governments.” He said also that Ehud Olmert did not “have the political weight to sell such an agreement to the Israeli public.” For her part, the White House Spokesperson Dana Perino in her July 28 press briefing: “We’ve always said that we wouldn’t be able to get a final peace deal in terms of everything being resolved.” She added: “America’s goal is to outline all the steps that they would have to take to move forward.”
|
|
Read more...
|
|
America's Invasion of the Region |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
|
Bismillah Al-Rahman Al-Raheem
Communiqué from Hizb ut-Tahrir
It seems that America is heading towards yet another success in driving the rest of the world towards achieving her aims and interests from her invasion of the region. It has become conspicuously clear from the events, developments and debates taking place between the major powers at the Security Council and outside it that the issue of Iraq is heading towards being settled in the manner that the American administration wants.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
The recent interactions that occurred to the Middle-Eastern Issue |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
|
Bismillah Al-Rahman Al-Raheem
Political Chatter
The recent interactions that occurred to the Middle-Eastern Issue
The recent interactions of the Middle-Eastern issue have revealed in a conspicuous and elaborate manner what had been agreed upon in the Camp David Resort on 11th July 2000. On the Palestinian plane, Arafat was deliberately portrayed as a militant figure, which did not yield to the American and Israeli pressures. This was in an attempt to restore confidence in him among the Palestinians and the Arabs in general, in the hope that this will contribute towards making what he is about to perpetrate acceptable. This was followed by a visit that Arafat made on 26th July 2000 to the countries of the region in general and to other European and Asian countries. He announced that the trip was aimed at consulting the brethren and the friendly countries about what had been agreed upon in the Summit and about the declaration of the Palestinian state, which was scheduled for 13th of September 2000. The statements of Arafat made it clear that he was blaming the Israelis for their stubbornness. For his part, the secretary general of the Palestinian cabinet, Ahmed Abdul-Rahman stated on 1st September 2000 that: "If the Palestinians did not get their state through negotiations, they would get it through the intifada." He added: "The Israelis should leave peacefully, and if they did not, the intifada, and more than that, would be waiting for them."
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
The Great Hoax - Arab Spring & GMEI
Middle East